11/11/2023 0 Comments Edwin h sutherland![]() (1982) The American criminological tradition. The criminological enterprise-Theories and perspectives. Dailey (Eds.), White-collar crime and economic crime. ![]() Sutherland: A biographical and analytical commentary. Vande Walle (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of white-collar and corporate crime in Europe. White-collar crime in Europe: American reflections. Journal of Human Justice, 3, 5–21.įriedrichs, D. White collar crime and the definitional quagmire: A provisional solution. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.įriedrichs, D. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.įiller, L. Boston: Northeastern University Press.ĭriver, E. Laub (Ed.), Criminology in the making: An oral history. Who are the most influential criminologists in the English-speaking world? British Journal of Criminology, 34, 204–225.Ĭressey, D. Contemporary Sociology, 19, 98–99.Ĭohn, E., & Farrington, D. Review: The criminology of Edwin Sutherland. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Ĭohen, A. Laub (Ed.), Criminology in the making: An oral history (pp. On the symbiosis between criminal law and criminal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.īurrough, B. Tiryakian (Ed.), The phenomenon of sociology. What is criminology? Oxford: Oxford University Press.īramson, L. The Criminologist, 40, 8–10.īosworth, M., & Hoyle, C. The Routledge international handbook of the crimes of the powerful. An evaluation of journal impact factors: A case study of the top three Journals ranked in criminology and penology. New York: Washington Square Press.īaker, T. Criminal Justice Studies, 26, 1–18.īacon, F. The Sutherland tradition in criminology: A bibliometric Story. Sociological Inquiry, 59, 423–438.Īlaheto, T., & Persson, O. Cressey: An intellectual portrait of a criminologist. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Īkers, R., & Matsueda, R. Adler (Eds.), The origins of American criminology (pp. The origins of me and of social learning theory: Personal and professional recollections. A closing section identifies some typically overlooked radical observations of Sutherland’s.Ībend, G. Criminological “influence” is complex, and not easily testable. Some attention is devoted to contemporaries or near contemporaries (including the Dutch Marxist Willem Bonger) of Sutherland in relation to why their influence has been more limited than that of Sutherland. While Sutherland is especially known for his theory of differential association, his own history suggests that “influence” broadly conceived is complex and idiosyncratic and does not lend itself well to straightforward prediction, hence a “theory” of differential influence (applying differential quite differently from Sutherland) is advanced. Sutherland’s principal contributions to criminology are identified along with the limitations of these contributions. Sutherland’s status as a key thinker among criminologists-for many critical criminologists as well as mainstream criminologists-is addressed, with special attention to the various dimensions of his background that render this status highly improbable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |